Brian Pendreigh

Brian Pendreigh

Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the cinema…

Don Quixote, Peter O'Toole and me...

It has taken me 40 years, but I have finally managed to watch the film The Man of La Mancha. I can remember pictures of Peter O'Toole as a bewhiskered Don Quixote when it came out (ABC Film Review maybe?) and I think it played the Odeon in Edinburgh, but not for long. It got dreadful reviews and disappeared.

Was it really that bad? After all it was inspired by one of the classics of world literature, the musical had been a big hit and highly praised in New York and it had an excellent cast, headed by O'Toole, one of the greatest actors of his generation - a record eight Oscar nominations without a single win, the Academy's loss rather than O'Toole's.

Fascinating guy, I met him once or twice, interviewed him in his trailer on the set of a movie and he sat in his underwear throughout the entire interview.

Did the critics get it wrong? Maybe it is a little plodding at times, a little confined in its staging, but not in its imagination. And surely that his the whole point of the thing? I had seen it on stage before and The Impossible Dream is one of the greatest songs in musical theatre, one of the greatest lyrics - "to march into hell for a heavenly cause", a song about belief, about one man standing up, making a difference.

And O'Toole is a great actor. I marvel at the way his eyes well with tears. He manages to produce something quite moving, despite his limitations as a singer and the fact that, yes, he does fall short of the performance of Richard Kiley, who was virtually unknown when he got the role off-Broadway. Sometimes man and role are just a perfect one-off. Topol anyone?

Famously Cervantes and Shakespeare died on the same day, April 23 (St George's Day) 1616 -  except it was the same date, but not actually the same day.

Spain was on the Gregorian calendar, whereas England did not move from the old Julian system till 1752, when 11 days simply didn't happen. There is a remnant of the old system in the dating of the financial year. Pre-1752 New Year was March 25 (Lady Day), with ten days allowed to settle old debts, which is why the fiscal year still starts on April 6. Anyway, getting away from the point there...

The film Man of La Mancha has great songs, great moments, great imagination and a very good performance by O'Toole playing roles within roles. It is due a critical reevaluation. Maybe not a classic, but worth watching.

Great songwriter, lots of mistakes in obits

Robert Sherman, one of half of the great songwriting team of the Sherman brothers, has died. They did the songs for Mary Poppins and Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, as well as You're Sixteen (a US No 1 for Ringo in 1974), Ugly Bug Ball and The Wonderful Thing About Tiggers (a philosophical masterpiece, as were so many of their songs, generally upbeat, often silly, wonderfully life-affirming).
I don't think I have ever seen so many mistakes in obituaries however. Their dad's song For Sentimental Reasons is not the well known song of that name, it's different; Roy Disney is not... Walt's son; the Shermans did not write Bare Necessities - it was the only Gilkyson composition retained on the final soundtrack of Jungle Book, and The Sword in the Stone is not a live-action film, as stated in the Guardian. But then perhaps it was in the public interest to claim the film was live action, so that's all right then.

Quiz & book news... Coming to terms with Max's death

It is a while since I posted. Our quiz team beat the Eggheads, but within 48 hours of the broadcast, Max Thomson, one of the core members of our team, took his own life. http://www.scotsman.com/the-scotsman/obituaries/obituary_max_thomson_city_transport_executive_and_family_man_renowned_as_a_genial_quiz_champion_1_2088266

There was obviously a lot of press coverage and it was a very difficult time.

The Edinburgh Evening News maintained an interest and their report on our most recent quiz is on line here http://www.scotsman.com/edinburgh-evening-news/friends_pay_tribute_to_trivia_teammate_by_winning_quiz_1_2141253

I am on Sky Atlantic's Cleverdicks quiz at 7 pm tonight (February 29) in a contest that includes Rob Hannah, 2-time champ and full-time quizzer. It is repeated a couple of times tomorrow and is available on the Sky version of catch-up. I won't see it live as I am off out at a quiz.

Sales of The Man in the Seventh Row continue to tick over, very slowly, so if you liked it please do tell your friends. Ebooks are so dependent on word of mouth.

At some point Blasted Heath are likely to bring out a volume of my short stories.

The newspaper industry is now on the point of total collapse. I really don't know why they are bothering to continue with the Leveson inquiry, when there is virtually no industry left anyway. In the meantime I am hopeful that the top-secret Project X might come to fruition. We have a brilliant team on board. More about that later. Maybe.

 

Eggheads TV appearance

I have a feature on quizzing in The Scotsman Saturday magazine today (January 14), pegged to my team's appearance on Eggheads on Monday.
http://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/arts-blog/for_the_buzz_the_attraction_of_quizzes_1_2058426

What’s it like to take your quiz team from a cosy night in the pub to an appearance on tV’s toughest quiz show? Lifelong quizzer Brian Pendreigh has the answer

 

The night before we recorded Eggheads I had this thing going through my head. It was the chorus line from a song called Knocked It Off.

Eggheads is the long-running BBC quiz in which a team of punters take on a team of expert quizzers, including winners of Mastermind, Brain of Britain and Who Wants to be a Millionaire? Knocked It Off is a jaunty old BA Robertson song with a line: “I was standing in the goal line when the ball got crossed; I thought I’ll have a go and shoot it, but I never thought I’d put it away.”

When I wake up, in the cold light of dawn, I remember that Eggheads are, in the words of presenter Jeremy Vine, “possibly the greatest quiz team in Britain”. They include Kevin Ashman and Pat Gibson, world champions and the two greatest quizzers of modern times. We are a pub quiz side that used to feel quite chuffed if we won down at the Starbank Inn in Edinburgh every now and then.

This is national television, with an audience of more than two million. What if my mind goes blank? What if the words come out wrong, like the person who was asked who painted the Mona Lisa and answered Leonardo DiCaprio?

Private Eye has a column called Dumb Britain featuring the most stupid answers from quiz shows. Presenter: Name a film starring Bob Hoskins that is also the name of a famous painting by Leonardo da Vinci. Contestant: Who Framed Roger Rabbit?

I always say, in any quiz, always guess something, however unlikely – but it’s easier to do that in the pub than on television. There was a time on University Challenge when Jeremy Paxman asked what Cherry Pickers and Cheesemongers were. They are nicknames for British regiments. But “homosexuals” was an excellent guess.

We are fascinated by quizzes. Thousands gather in pubs every week to test their knowledge of everything from The X Factor to Excalibur, while television quizzes have that extra voyeuristic twist, the potential thrill of seeing people making fools of themselves.

That’s where we come in.

The origin of the word “quiz”, like many pub quiz answers, is a matter of debate. There is a story that in the late 18th century a Dublin theatre owner made a bet that he could introduce a new word into the language. Reputedly he hired dozens of local children to chalk “quiz” on walls around town. Everyone was talking about this new word, asking each other what it meant. The first quiz was born. It is a neat wee story, almost certainly untrue.

By the 1920s quiz books were appearing in shops and quizzes proved popular on the emerging medium of radio. American television pioneered the big-money quiz in the 1950s with The $64,000 Question and Twenty-One. Charles Van Doren was a multiple winner who became a celebrity in his own right. Then came the bombshell ... it was fixed. Robert Redford made the film Quiz Show about it.

Back in Britain, television quizzes were more civilised, at least at first. They became part of popular culture. Morecambe and Wise and the Two Ronnies did their own versions of Mastermind. And The Young Ones spoofed University Challenge when Scumbag College took on Footlights College, Oxbridge, including Stephen Fry, whose real-life appearance on University Challenge in 1980 can still be seen on YouTube.

Trivial Pursuit took quizzing into the average home in the 1980s. Then came pub quiz machines, the spread of pub quizzes and on television The Weakest Link and Who Wants to be a Millionaire?, which presented the possibility of becoming a millionaire overnight. Only five people ever won the £1 million prize, including Pat Gibson and Judith Keppel, who are both now on Eggheads.

Who Wants to be a Millionaire? was real fantasy stuff. An international hit, it inspired the Oscar-winning film Slumdog Millionaire, as well as the fiendish plotting of Charles Ingram and Tecwen Whittock and his famous cough, signalling right and wrong answers. I know a few people who have won big money on the show, and a few who have lost tens of thousands (and in one case got to the £125,000 question with all three lifelines, gambled and got it wrong). That takes a while to come to terms with.

I grew up doing quizzes. My uncle, Jim Brunton, was on various TV and radio quizzes, including Brain of Britain. In 1986 we both went in for a BBC quiz called Superscot, not knowing the other had entered. We both reached the final, we produced a couple of quiz books together and our quizzes became a regular feature in The Scotsman.

That ran its course and for a while my quizzing was restricted to Trivial Pursuit, which was fun to play over dinner and a few bottles of wine.

I started doing pub quizzes in the late 1990s. One night we went to our usual pub for a pint after badminton and there was a quiz on. Then we found a more interesting quiz and went regularly every fortnight. Our team changed over time and we were joined by Mark Gaffney, who I knew through tennis. He suggested we put in for Eggheads, not long after it started in 2003.

However, for most of our regulars the quiz was really just an excuse to go along to the pub and have a few drinks with mates. It was 2009 before Mark and I began looking for other people who were up for appearing on TV. We applied for Eggheads in January 2010, auditioned in May 2010 and were shortlisted. We then had to sit back and wait. Or rather, every week we went out and did a pub quiz. We visited a lot of pubs, quizzed under the name of The Dude Abides (a reference to the film The Big Lebowski) and won more than we lost.

In the meantime I reached the semi-finals on Mastermind. Mark and I went on the STV quiz Postcode Challenge, along with my son Ewen and Max Thomson, who would be in our final Eggheads line-up. We set a record score and went home with £5,000. Channel 4 put together an all-star team for a programme called Quiz Trippers. They came to Edinburgh and we beat them. If we were to win on Eggheads we would probably be the first team to win three different TV quizzes.

We are competitive. Most of us play or played tennis and other games, sometimes in front of an audience. And I guess television provides a chance to show off. Most quizzers, both in pubs and at a more serious level, are male, though I noticed a few weeks ago at Ye Olde Inn in Davidson’s Mains that the majority were female. Quizzers are certainly not all male, overweight, middle-aged couch-potatoes. One of my quizzing friends is also into motor racing and is off to climb Everest soon.

We recorded Eggheads in Glasgow way back in January 2011 under the name Tramlines. It is nicely ambiguous – in doubles a shot down the tramlines is a good shot, in singles it is out. Just a few weeks ago I did the Brain of Britain radio quiz, though amazingly it is scheduled to go out on the same day. Quizzes? They’re just like buses really.

On Eggheads there are nine possible quiz subjects and four come up in any one programme. The challengers play the Eggheads in a series of individual rounds. The loser is out, the winner rejoins their team for the vital final round on general knowledge.

We divided the subjects between the five of us, obviously hoping that David Gow, our scientist, could answer on Science. But we did not know the subjects in advance, so we all had to be ready for a number of possibilities. The worst case scenario was something along the lines of David having to do History, and then Science coming up after he had played.

In the individual rounds we got to choose which Egghead to take on. They have a pool of seven from which five will play in any one programme. Man for man, they are better than us. But for what it’s worth our strategy was to be that we would take on their strongest players in the individual rounds in the hope of knocking one or two out before the final round, where the remaining players get to confer on answers.

Even a team that loses every individual round will have one player left for the final round of three questions, with multiple choice options. It decides the whole quiz and anything can happen there. There have been times when the Eggheads have got one wrong in that round and the challengers have made a couple of lucky guesses and won the whole thing. Recently a team won it by guessing the correct surname for the fictional character Trilby, even though they thought Trilby was a man. It’s tougher if it goes to tie-break questions with no multiple choice.

To return to the football analogy, Eggheads is like a penalty shoot-out, but without the actual game first. Over 90 minutes they would beat us without a doubt. In a penalty shoot-out they are still better, but there is a chance, a slim chance. Jeremy Vine is great, saying that unlike other quiz shows there is no time pressure, we have as long as we want to answer.

Half an hour and much indecisiveness later he is gently insisting that we are going to have to give an answer some time. I can’t say what happens, obviously, but we didn’t expect to win, we did it for the fun of it.

If this was a movie we would now cut to a scene later that same evening when we reconvened in The Water Line in Leith and did the pub quiz there. And, yes, we won that one. Was that the second leg in a glorious double? Or was our earlier quiz a heroic failure? Is this the point where Knocked It Off plays once more on our imaginary soundtrack?

You’ll have to tune in to find out.

 

Brian’s team appear on Eggheads on Monday, BBC2 at 6pm. Brian is also on Brain of Britain on Radio 4, on the same day at 3pm.

First film director I ever met...

http://www.scotsman.com/news/obituaries/obituary_don_sharp_director_whose_range_encompassed_the_thirty_nine_steps_to_hammer_horrors_1_2017581Obituary: Don Sharp - Director whose range encompassed The Thirty-Nine Steps to Hammer horrors

Born: 19 April, 1921, in Hobart, Tasmania. Died: 18 December, 2011, aged 90

 

DON Sharp came from a generation when it was possible to work your way to the top in the film business doing pretty much anything and everything. A child actor in Australia, he came to Britain in the late 1940s, made several films with Hammer and Christopher Lee and directed the third and most faithful adaptation of The Thirty-Nine Steps in south-west Scotland.

Alfred Hitchcock’s 1935 version of John Buchan’s classic spy yarn was set largely in the Highlands and shot mainly in the studio in London. The 1959 remake took Hitchcock as its template. Sharp, however, went back to the original novel for his film in 1978. It had a period setting, before the First World War. The eponymous steps were actual, physical steps, not a secret organisation, as Hitchcock would have it. And Sharp shot in the area that had provided the setting in the original story.

He filmed at various locations in the south-west, including Castlemilk House, near Lockerbie; Morton Castle, near Thornhill; the village of Durisdeer, the Forest of Ae and the Duke of Buccleuch’s Drumlanrig estate, although the railway scenes were done on the Severn Valley Railway. However, Sharp departed from Buchan’s storyline for the climax. His denouement was much more cinematic with the hero, played by Robert Powell, famously dangling from the hands of Big Ben.

Donald Herman Sharp was born in Hobart, Tasmania, in 1921 according to military records, though reference sources invariably give his year of birth as 1922. During the Second World War, he served in the Royal Australian Air Force and with the coming of the peace he did as many of his countrymen did and headed for England.

Initially, he found work mainly as an actor. He had a major role in Ha’penny Breeze, a 1950 B-movie that he co-wrote and which mixed yachting and romance. He played an officer in The Cruel Sea, but seemed to be slipping down cast lists, rather than rising up them.

By the mid-1950s he had moved behind the camera. He served as second unit director on the classic war film Carve Her Name with Pride and he directed films for the Children’s Film Foundation and episodes of the police TV series Ghost Squad.

Sharp first tapped into the developing youth music scene with the 1958 film The Golden Disc and he married one of the actresses, Mary Steele.

He subsequently worked with Tommy Steele, one of Britain’s biggest pop stars, on It’s All Happening. It was 1963 and the whole British scene was exploding with the emergence of the Beatles, the Stones and their contemporaries, and Sharp was well-qualified to help the new stars realise their big-screen ambitions. He chose instead to throw in his lot with Hammer Films, which had reinvigorated the horror genre in the late 1950s, but was seeing shrinking returns on rising budgets.

Hammer was keen to hire Sharp because he had a reputation of delivering value for money, though he had reputedly never even watched a horror film before. He immersed himself in the genre and made an immediate impact with the first, highly atmospheric scene of The Kiss of the Vampire, in which a spade is driven straight through the lid of a coffin, eliciting a spine-tingling scream and flow of crimson.

The Kiss of the Vampire was made with a largely unfamiliar (ie cheap) cast. Sharp did get the chance to work with one of Hammer’s biggest stars on The Devil-Ship Pirates. It was the first of six films he would make with Christopher Lee over a 15-year period from the mid-1960s to late 1970s.

Sharp directed Lee in Rasputin the Mad Monk and as the old oriental villain Fu Manchu in The Face of Fu Manchu and its sequel, The Brides of Fu Manchu. They also worked together on Dark Places and finally on Bear Island, an adaptation of one of the novels by the best-selling Scottish novelist Alistair MacLean, about lost Nazi gold. It was shot on location in Alaska and Canada and also starred Donald Sutherland and Vanessa Redgrave.

Unusually for a director who was finding regular employment in films, Sharp also continued to work in television, directing episodes of The Avengers and The Champions; a memorable version of The Four Feathers, with Powell, Simon Ward, Beau Bridges and Jane Seymour; an adaptation of Barbara Taylor Bradford’s A Woman of Substance, starring Jenny Seagrove; and Tusitala, a mini-series about Robert Louis Stevenson on Samoa.

Sharp also continued his relationship with Hammer on the small screen, directing one of the stories in the much-loved Hammer House of Horror series. His last credit was for another Taylor Bradford mini-series, Act of Will, in 1989. In his memoirs Tall, Dark and Gruesome, Lee paid the director the compliment of saying Sharp “knew as much as anybody about directing”. BRIAN PENDREIGH

The Artist: the silent movie that is taking Hollywood by storm

One of the best movies I have seen in years. It seems simple - a silent star's career is on the wane with the coming of sound, while a young woman goes from fan to star. But the seeming simplicity of it all hides the craft that has gone into the writing and structure. It is beautifully acted too - the dog is great. And the absence of dialogue foregrounds the power of the story, the emotion, the passion. It has a genuine feel for Hollywood history and it made me want to watch some of the silent epics again, films like Intolerance and King Vidor's The Crowd, which have that same emotional power. The only time a silent movie has won the Best Pic Oscar was Wings in the very first year. This could well be the second time.

From Camus to Kermit the Frog... Top Ten influences on shaping a novel

The Man in the Seventh Row selects his personal Top Ten Influences, the forces that made him the man he is today.

1 Movies

2 Things that have happened to the author, things that have happened to people the author knows, things the author has heard about

3 The Magnificent Seven

4 Magic realism

5 Nick Hornby's early books, particularly High Fidelity

6 Greek mythology and Blade Runner

7 Los Angeles and North Berwick

8 DOA

9 Steppenwolf by Herman Hesse and L’etranger by Albert Camus

10 Lord Jim by Joseph Conrad

 

Yes, I know, but a lot of titles don't make sense... Actually, Kermit the Frog's Rainbow Connection was there (as well as various other rainbow songs), but I revised the list and he dropped out.

A Writer Reflects (or should that be A Writer Rambles)...

My novel has been out for over a month now and I guess it is time to take stock.

 

It has had a fair number of reviews on line, as well as advance testimonials (Barry Norman, Andrew Marr), all positive. I discussed it on radio, it featured in The Times and was reviewed in The List. I seem to remember reading that most first novels (published as traditional physical entities) don’t get any reviews at all and sell around 500 copies, so I am already ahead on the first count, if not the second.

 

I have had a few interesting conversations about it recently as well with 1. a social worker, 2. a lawyer and 3. a fellow full-time writer.

 

The writer told me he is working on his first novel too. I asked what stage and he said it “there and nowhere” or “everywhere and nowhere” – I can’t remember which, as we were in the middle of a game of badminton at the time.

 

There is a big traumatic event towards the end of the book that helps explain what has gone before. The social worker thought the trauma and the reaction to it were so convincing that he was relieved to hear they were fictional.

 

The lawyer asked if I knew how the story would end when I began it. I did, though I didn’t know the exact route the characters would take. (Driving a narrative is like driving a car - discuss.) There were occasional byways that I explored, films that I wanted to revisit, anecdotes (and jokes) I wanted to tell.

 

The lawyer also asked what everyone asks – how much is autobiographical. The answer is just some of the little things, not any of the big things. I have never been sucked into the action of a single movie. Not literally anyway. The book is a fiction and it is a very deliberate fiction. I reworked it so much that nothing is accidental (I hope), everything is there for a reason.

 

I guess having lived with the book for so long and reworked it so many times I became very aware of what might be seen as flaws and it is a huge relief that it is now out there and that people do like it and get it. I just wish there were more of them.

 

I think or hope it is possible to get something out of it on many different levels. And I would say that I thought this review was particularly insightful - http://loiteringwithintent.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/review-man-in-the-seventh-row-by-brian-pendreigh/

 

The book has been very positively reviewed, though I am aware that I could construct a convincing negative review as a professional critic (and someone who knows this book intimately – professional reviewers are under pressure of time and I have heard suggestions that not all reviewers read every page – you can generally tell which reviewers, because they take their quotes from the opening pages).

 

The book meanders through various film discussions at the beginning and I am not sure they work unless you know the films. Even one of my publishers said it was “slow burn”. Do people give up at that stage? The book is clearly in two halves – film nostalgia and discussion, followed by something which may or may not be a fantasy. Does the story move forward seamlessly? I don’t know.

 

People who read it then go on to buy the films, reread the book and one case even rethink the course of their own life. Which is good (I think), but it is difficult to get an e-book into people’s consciousness. So if you have read the book and liked it please tell people. If you haven’t read it, it is £1.99, so give it a go, and skim the early chapters if you are not mad about film.

 

One thing I would say is that initially, years ago, I liked the early stuff better, but then I am a cineaste. Now I actually think the later chapters are what really makes the whole thing work (if it does work). They constitute the “I didn’t know he was going there” moments, the moments when people draw breath or shed a tear, they are what is prompting people to go back and read it again.

 

I am going to post my Top Ten Influences separately…

Sean Connery, Ricky Gervais and the press

For years Sean Connery has been insisting he is retired. And he seems to be sticking pretty much to his word, just doing very occasional things as favours, such as voiceover work for a new film for St Andrews University, but not exactly a comeback.

Then last week a report appears in the press that Ricky Gervais is doing a pilot for a tv show set in a retirement home and he would like Sean to be in it. Now, you must ask yourself - how likely is it that Sean, who is now in his 80s and living a quiet and extremely comfortable retirement in a private development next to a golf course in the Bahamas is going to come out of retirement... to come back to Britain... to make a pilot... for a tv show... with Ricky Gervais!

Well, you would think you might ask yourself that. You would think there might be a degree of scepticism, a degree of what planet are you living on Ricky (especially after your latest efforts)?

But, no, later reports have Sean "in talks" for the show, "poised to sign", and now apparently actually making the pilot show with Gervais... though there is no quote whatsoever beyond Gervais's initial comment that he would like him to do the show.

OK, I could be wrong, Sean may come out of retirement to come back to freezing, cold Britain to do a tv show with Ricky Gervais. Believe what you will. Must dash, I think that was another pig landing on the roof.